Industries · Manufacturing

Manufacturing

The part, the fault code, and the last fix still live in people and PDFs.

Discuss a manufacturing problem →

The pain, named

Field knowledge is still in people, PDFs, and plant memory.

Which part fits the model, what the fault code means, how the dealer fixed it last time. A technician or an agent cannot query that. Ground the workflow in equipment, parts, and service history before judging a chatbot over document search.

Use cases

Specific workflows,
in buyer language.

These are operating problems, not generic technology categories. Each one links to relevant experience only where the match is exact.

  1. 01

    Field-service copilot

    Answers from equipment history and manuals, not a search box over a document pile.

  2. 02

    Parts & BOM intelligence

    Which part fits which machine, across models and revisions, without plant-by-plant reconciliation.

  3. 03

    Supply-chain resilience

    Which suppliers and lines fail together when a part goes short.

Selected experience

Related work,
clearly labeled.

These are anonymized experience examples, not client references or endorsements.

01

Global agricultural equipment manufacturer · Agentic AI deployment on an enterprise graph

Global agricultural equipment manufacturer · full agentic AI deployment

Agents that could use connected equipment, parts, and business context instead of isolated system extracts.

Global agricultural equipment manufacturer →

Regulatory context

Requirements,
from primary sources.

EU AI Act

EU high-risk rules can apply when AI is a machinery safety component and third-party conformity assessment is required.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 ↗

Start with the operating problem

Bring the decision,
workflow, or system.

The first conversation clarifies what must change, why it matters now, and what evidence would support the next decision.

Discuss the problem →